The Critical Perspectives and Position Papers (CPPP) section of the Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Computing Applications (JAICA) offers a platform for articulating thought-provoking arguments, critiques, and reflections on emerging or established topics within the realms of artificial intelligence and computing. These contributions play a crucial role in the scientific community by challenging conventional paradigms, encouraging debate, and inspiring new directions for research and practice.
The CPPP section is particularly beneficial for researchers, educators, and practitioners seeking to engage with critical viewpoints, share reflective analyses, or explore unresolved challenges and underexplored opportunities. By presenting well-reasoned perspectives, CPPPs contribute to advancing the discourse on AI, fostering innovation, and encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue.
Recognizing the unique nature and purpose of CPPPs, JAICA has outlined a specific structure to ensure these contributions are coherent, impactful, and actionable. This structure is designed to guide authors in developing their arguments effectively, ensuring clarity, depth, and relevance.
The solicited structure for CPPPs within JAICA is as follows:
1. Introduction:
Begin with a compelling introduction to the topic, highlighting its significance and establishing the scope of the argument. Clearly state the objectives or central position of the paper.
2. Position or Argument:
Present the main argument or critique in a clear, logical manner. Develop the perspective with relevant evidence, examples, or references to existing work, ensuring a well-supported and reasoned discussion.
3. Discussion:
Interpret the broader implications of the argument for the field of artificial intelligence and computing. Discuss how the presented perspective addresses gaps, challenges existing ideas, or inspires new research directions. Highlight any limitations or counterpoints where applicable.
4. Conclusion:
Summarize the key points of the paper, reinforce the central argument, and suggest potential future research directions, practical applications, or policy implications.